Anixter v. Continental Cas. Co.

Tenth Circuit

Anixter v. Continental Cas. Co.

946 F.2d 900, 1991 WL 216790

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedOctober 23, 1991

Docket91-5052

StatusPublished

This text of 946 F.2d 900 (Anixter v. Continental Cas. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anixter v. Continental Cas. Co., 946 F.2d 900, 1991 WL 216790 (10th Cir. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

946 F.2d 900

Anixter (Ivan A.), Kunkel (E.M.), Cross (Wynema Anna,
Norman, Jr.), Cross & Co., Borch (Fred), Smith (J.), Ammidon
(Hoyt), Dennler (William), Gates (Thomas), Westfall (Ted),
Bueche (Arthur), Gouldthorpe (Hubert), McCune (Francis),
Buda (Joseph), Horak (Joseph), Hilburn (Earl), Waldron
(Hicks), Lockton (John), Powers (Peter), Thorner (Thomas),
Grohne (William), Warren (Beatrice), Bennett (Joseph)
v.
Continental Casualty Company, Amer. Home Assur. Co., Fed. Ins. Co.

NO. 91-5052

United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.

OCT 23, 1991

Appeal From: N.D.Okl.

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI