Anitra Freeman v. Jeffrey Henderson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 24, 2022
DocketA22A1437
StatusPublished

This text of Anitra Freeman v. Jeffrey Henderson (Anitra Freeman v. Jeffrey Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anitra Freeman v. Jeffrey Henderson, (Ga. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ June 24, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A1437. ANITRA FREEMAN v. JEFFREY HENDERSON.

The action underlying this appeal was initiated in 2019 when Anitra Freeman sought a temporary protective order against Jeffrey Henderson, the father of her minor children. The trial court issued a series of family violence protective orders against Henderson and ordered him to pay $1,000 per month in child support. In March 2022, Freeman filed a petition to hold Henderson in contempt based on his failure to pay child support and a motion to modify the protective order for the same reason. The trial court scheduled a hearing, but Freeman failed to appear. Accordingly, the court dismissed her petition for citation of contempt and motion to modify the protective order. Freeman then filed this appeal. The trial court’s order, however, is not subject to direct appeal. Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), a party must follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review in a domestic relations case, including those that involve family violence. See Schmidt v. Schmidt, 270 Ga. 461 (1) (510 SE2d 810) (1999). “[T]he term ‘family violence’ means . . . acts between past or present spouses, persons who are parents of the same child, parents and children, stepparents and stepchildren, foster parents and foster children, or other persons living or formerly living in the same household[.]” OCGA § 19-13-1. “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Freeman’s failure to follow the required appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/24/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schmidt v. Schmidt
510 S.E.2d 810 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)
Smoak v. Department of Human Resources
471 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Anitra Freeman v. Jeffrey Henderson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anitra-freeman-v-jeffrey-henderson-gactapp-2022.