Anita Smith v. Fia Card Services, N.A.
This text of Anita Smith v. Fia Card Services, N.A. (Anita Smith v. Fia Card Services, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,_________________ May 23, 2012
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A12A1760. ANITA SMITH v. FIA CARD SERVICES, N. A.
FIA Card Services, N. A. filed suit against Anita Smith to recover amounts allegedly owed on a credit card, and the trial court granted FIA Card Services motion for summary judgment in the amount of $2,183.62. Smith filed a direct appeal from this ruling. Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6), however, appeals in all actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000 or less must comply with discretionary appeal procedures. Because this suit is an action for damages and the judgment entered was less than $10,000, a discretionary application was required under OCGA § 5-6-35. See Jennings v. Moss, 253 Ga. App. 357 (509 SE2d 655) (1998). Given Smith’s failure to file an application, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 05/23/2012 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,_________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anita Smith v. Fia Card Services, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anita-smith-v-fia-card-services-na-gactapp-2012.