Anita F. Kawaja v. Derek U. Obialo
This text of Anita F. Kawaja v. Derek U. Obialo (Anita F. Kawaja v. Derek U. Obialo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued September 17, 2021
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00458-CV ——————————— ANITA F. KAWAJA, ANTHONY R. SUEING, SR., FRONTLINE RECOVERY AND CONSULTING, INC., AND FRONTLINE RECOVERY AND CONSULTING NORTH, INC., Appellants V. DEREK U. OBIALO, Appellee
On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2021-18043
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from the denial by operation of law of appellants’ motions
to dismiss pursuant to the Texas Citizens Participation Act (TCPA). Appellants have
filed an emergency motion to dismiss this appeal without prejudice, issue mandate immediately, and for extension of time to file a new notice of appeal. Appellee has
filed a response, agreeing to dismissal of the appeal, but opposing immediate
issuance of the mandate and extension of time to file a notice of appeal. No opinion
has issued.
The Court grants appellants’ request for dismissal and for immediate issuance
of the mandate and orders this appeal dismissed without prejudice. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 18.6, 42.1. The Clerk of this Court is directed to issue the mandate immediately.
Appellants’ request for extension of time to file notice of appeal is dismissed as
premature.1 Any pending motions, other than those discussed in this opinion, are
dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Farris.
1 Appellants included a request for an extension of time to file notice of appeal in the event the trial court fails to enter new orders granting the motions to dismiss. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3 permits this Court to grant an extension for filing a notice of appeal only if appellants have filed a notice of appeal in the trial court and a motion for extension of time to file that notice of appeal in this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Because appellants have not yet filed a notice of appeal, the request for an extension of time to file notice of appeal is premature. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anita F. Kawaja v. Derek U. Obialo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anita-f-kawaja-v-derek-u-obialo-texapp-2021.