Animal Defense Council v. Donald P. Hodel, Southern Arizona Water Resources Association, Defendants-Intervenors

867 F.2d 1244, 1989 WL 14344
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 24, 1989·No. 86-2453·Published·Cited by 95 cases

Opinion

ORDER

We regret that in the opinion, published at 840 F.2d 1432, there was an error made on page 1436, in the second column in the first full paragraph. This paragraph should read as follows:

The district court may also inquire outside of the administrative record “when it appears the agency has relied on documents or materials not included in the record.” Public Power Council [v. John son], 674 F.2d [791] at 794 [9th Cir.1982], In addition, discovery may be permitted if supplementation of the record is necessary to explain technical terms or complex subject matter involved in the agency action. Id.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Animal Defense Council v. Donald P. Hodel, Southern Arizona Water Resources Association, Defendants-Intervenors, 867 F.2d 1244, 1989 WL 14344 (9th Cir. 1989).

867 F.2d 1244 (Animal Defense Council v. Donald P. Hodel, Southern Arizona Water Resources Association, Defendants-Intervenors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related