Animal Defense Council v. Donald P. Hodel, Southern Arizona Water Resources Association, Defendants-Intervenors

Ninth Circuit

Animal Defense Council v. Donald P. Hodel, Southern Arizona Water Resources Association, Defendants-Intervenors

867 F.2d 1244, 1989 WL 14344

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 24, 1989

Docket86-2453

StatusPublished

Cited by95 cases

This text of 867 F.2d 1244 (Animal Defense Council v. Donald P. Hodel, Southern Arizona Water Resources Association, Defendants-Intervenors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Animal Defense Council v. Donald P. Hodel, Southern Arizona Water Resources Association, Defendants-Intervenors, 867 F.2d 1244, 1989 WL 14344 (9th Cir. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

We regret that in the opinion, published at 840 F.2d 1432, there was an error made on page 1436, in the second column in the first full paragraph. This paragraph should read as follows:

The district court may also inquire outside of the administrative record “when it appears the agency has relied on documents or materials not included in the record.” Public Power Council [v. John son], 674 F.2d [791] at 794 [9th Cir.1982], In addition, discovery may be permitted if supplementation of the record is necessary to explain technical terms or complex subject matter involved in the agency action. Id.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

We regret that in the opinion, published at 840 F.2d 1432, there was an error made on page 1436, in the second column in the first full paragraph. This paragraph should read as follows:

The district court may also inquire outside of the administrative record “when it appears the agency has relied on documents or materials not included in the record.” Public Power Council [v. John son], 674 F.2d [791] at 794 [9th Cir.1982], In addition, discovery may be permitted if supplementation of the record is necessary to explain technical terms or complex subject matter involved in the agency action. Id.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

867 F.2d 1244, 1989 WL 14344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/animal-defense-council-v-donald-p-hodel-southern-arizona-water-resources-ca9-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack