Anil v. City of New York
This text of 280 A.D.2d 503 (Anil v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), entered April 4, 2000, which denied his motion, in effect, for leave to reargue his prior motion to restore the action to the court’s calendar, which was denied by prior order of the same court dated July 15, 1999.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The plaintiffs motion was, in effect, for reargument. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Svechak v Svechak, 264 AD2d 836; Awadallah v Russo, 205 AD2d 721). Ritter, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
280 A.D.2d 503, 720 N.Y.S.2d 376, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anil-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2001.