Aniero Concrete Co. v. Lazer Electrical Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Aniero Concrete Co. v. Lazer Electrical Corp.

250 A.D.2d 675, 671 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5588

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D.2d 675 (Aniero Concrete Co. v. Lazer Electrical Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aniero Concrete Co. v. Lazer Electrical Corp., 250 A.D.2d 675, 671 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5588 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by Lazer Electrical Corporation from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), entered February 25, 1997, and two orders of the same court, dated April 14, 1997, and April 15, 1997, respectively.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed for reasons stated by Justice Golar in his memorandum decision at the Supreme Court, dated January 28, 1997; and it is further,

Ordered that the orders are affirmed for reasons stated by Justice Golar at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the petitioner is awarded one bill of costs. Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by Lazer Electrical Corporation from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), entered February 25, 1997, and two orders of the same court, dated April 14, 1997, and April 15, 1997, respectively.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed for reasons stated by Justice Golar in his memorandum decision at the Supreme Court, dated January 28, 1997; and it is further,

Ordered that the orders are affirmed for reasons stated by Justice Golar at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the petitioner is awarded one bill of costs. Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D.2d 675, 671 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aniero-concrete-co-v-lazer-electrical-corp-nyappdiv-1998.