Anides v. Kahar Realty Corp.
This text of 283 A.D. 822 (Anides v. Kahar Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action by vendees of real property to impress a lien thereon and to recover the amount paid on account of the contract of sale, on the ground of alleged false representations as to the condition of the building and other matters, the appeal is from an order denying appellants’ motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disburse[823]*823ments. (Of. Massler v. Smit, 279 App. Div. 941, and Hettinger v. Abeles, 283 App. Div. 726.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate and Beldock, JJ., concur; Adel, J., concurs but adheres to his views expressed in the dissenting- memorandum in Hettinger v. Abeles (283 App. Div. 726, 727).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D. 822, 129 N.Y.S.2d 247, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anides-v-kahar-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1954.