Anicet v. Jones

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Anicet v. Jones

245 So. 3d 992

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 9, 2018

DocketNo. 3D18–0047

StatusPublished

This text of 245 So. 3d 992 (Anicet v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anicet v. Jones, 245 So. 3d 992 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Denied. See Barnard v. State, 949 So.2d 250, 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) ("Habeas corpus may not be used to file successive 3.850 motions or to raise issues which would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850." (citing Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236, 1245-46 (Fla. 2004) ) ); see also Hernandez v. State, 990 So.2d 1116, 1118 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ("However, even if we were to address the petition on the merits, it would be denied as the ground raised is refuted by the record.").

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Denied. See Barnard v. State, 949 So.2d 250, 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) ("Habeas corpus may not be used to file successive 3.850 motions or to raise issues which would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850." (citing Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236, 1245-46 (Fla. 2004) ) ); see also Hernandez v. State, 990 So.2d 1116, 1118 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ("However, even if we were to address the petition on the merits, it would be denied as the ground raised is refuted by the record.").

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 So. 3d 992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anicet-v-jones-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack