Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Anicet v. Jones

Anicet v. Jones

245 So. 3d 992
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 9, 2018·No. No. 3D18–0047·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Denied. See Barnard v. State, 949 So.2d 250, 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) ("Habeas corpus may not be used to file successive 3.850 motions or to raise issues which would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850." (citing Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236, 1245-46 (Fla. 2004) ) ); see also Hernandez v. State, 990 So.2d 1116, 1118 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ("However, even if we were to address the petition on the merits, it would be denied as the ground raised is refuted by the record.").

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anicet v. Jones, 245 So. 3d 992 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

245 So. 3d 992 (Anicet v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hernandez v. State
990 So. 2d 1116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
Barnard v. State
949 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)