Ani v. City of Parkland

192 So. 3d 678, 2016 WL 3090790, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8349
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 1, 2016
DocketNo. 4D14-3873
StatusPublished

This text of 192 So. 3d 678 (Ani v. City of Parkland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ani v. City of Parkland, 192 So. 3d 678, 2016 WL 3090790, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8349 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Feldman v. Kritch, 824 So.2d 274, 277 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Ali R. Ghahramani, M.D., P.A. v. Pablo A. Guz[679]*679man, M.D., P.A., 768 So.2d 535, 537-38 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

GROSS, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ali Ghahramani, Md v. Pablo Guzman, Md
768 So. 2d 535 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Feldman v. Kritch
824 So. 2d 274 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 So. 3d 678, 2016 WL 3090790, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ani-v-city-of-parkland-fladistctapp-2016.