Anhar v. Citibank, N.A.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL ANHAR, Case No. 1:19-cv-00496-NONE-EPG
Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR v. DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
(ECF No. 45) Defendant.
CITIBANK, N.A, Counter-Claimant, v. MICHAEL ANHAR, Counter-Defendant.
On August 31, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 45.) In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The Court retains jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement. /// /// Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to assign a district judge for the purpose of closing this case and then to close this case.
Dated: _ September 1, 2021 [Jee ey UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anhar v. Citibank, N.A. (Anhar v. Citibank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.