Anhalt v. Stein

223 A.D. 767
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anhalt v. Stein. Read the opinion of the Court — 217 A.D. 751

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event, because of the court’s error in stating, in submitting the case to the jury, that “ the capitalization of a corporation includes not only the stock that has been actually issued and paid for, but also the stock that has been authorized in the proper manner and according to law, and which the officers have a right to issue and sell at their pleasure without the consent or acquiescence of any one.” (U. S. Radiator Co. v. State of New York, 208 N. Y. 144; Christensen v. Eno, 106 id. 97; Greenpoint Sugar Co. v. Whitin, 69 id. 328; Sturges v. Stetson, 23 Fed. Cas. [No. 13,568] 311, 313, 1 Biss. 246.) Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Seeger, JJ., concur; Young, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anhalt v. Stein, 223 A.D. 767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

223 A.D. 767 (Anhalt v. Stein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

U.S. Radiator Co. v. . State of New York
101 N.E. 783 (New York Court of Appeals, 1913)
Sturges v. Stetson
23 F. Cas. 311 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio, 1858)