Angus v. Backus, Thornton & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Angus v. Backus, Thornton & Co.

58 Ill. App. 259, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 10

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 4, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 58 Ill. App. 259 (Angus v. Backus, Thornton & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Angus v. Backus, Thornton & Co., 58 Ill. App. 259, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 10 (Ill. Ct. App. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Hr. Presiding Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion oe the Court.

This cause was begun before a justice of the peace; judgment being there had against the defendants, they appealed to'the Circuit Court; in that court on the 29th day of Hay, 1894, being at the Hay term, the record shows that the cause being called for trial, and the defendants failing to prosecute their appeal, the said , appeal was dismissed.

Thereafter, on the 29th day of September, 1894, being at the September term of said court, the defendants appeared and moved to set aside the said dismissal; and then and there made to appear to said court, certain matters on- account of which it is contended that said appeal was improperly dismissed. The Circuit Court refusing to set aside said dismissal, the defendants obtained, and have set forth in a bill of exceptions made on the 19th day of October, 1894, the matters and things presented to the court at the hearing of said motion to set aside such dismissal. Unfortunately for the contention of appellants, the Circuit Court had no power after the lapse of the term at which the appeal was dismissed, to amend or add to its record by or from either the affidavits of parties or its own recollection of what occurred during the Hay term. That term, the July and August terms, had passed, ere, by a bill of exceptions, first asked for at the September term and actually made at the October term, the court attempted to add to the record of this cause. It had then, as we have said, no power from recollection or affidavits to change its record.

The record of this cause presents no sufficient reason for setting aside the order of dismissal and final judgment entered at the Hay term. The refusal of the Circuit Court to set aside such dismissal is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hr. Presiding Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion oe the Court.

This cause was begun before a justice of the peace; judgment being there had against the defendants, they appealed to'the Circuit Court; in that court on the 29th day of Hay, 1894, being at the Hay term, the record shows that the cause being called for trial, and the defendants failing to prosecute their appeal, the said , appeal was dismissed.

Thereafter, on the 29th day of September, 1894, being at the September term of said court, the defendants appeared and moved to set aside the said dismissal; and then and there made to appear to said court, certain matters on- account of which it is contended that said appeal was improperly dismissed. The Circuit Court refusing to set aside said dismissal, the defendants obtained, and have set forth in a bill of exceptions made on the 19th day of October, 1894, the matters and things presented to the court at the hearing of said motion to set aside such dismissal. Unfortunately for the contention of appellants, the Circuit Court had no power after the lapse of the term at which the appeal was dismissed, to amend or add to its record by or from either the affidavits of parties or its own recollection of what occurred during the Hay term. That term, the July and August terms, had passed, ere, by a bill of exceptions, first asked for at the September term and actually made at the October term, the court attempted to add to the record of this cause. It had then, as we have said, no power from recollection or affidavits to change its record.

The record of this cause presents no sufficient reason for setting aside the order of dismissal and final judgment entered at the Hay term. The refusal of the Circuit Court to set aside such dismissal is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 Ill. App. 259, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angus-v-backus-thornton-co-illappct-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack