Angona v. City of Syracuse

118 A.D.3d 1321, 987 N.Y.S.2d 289
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Angona v. City of Syracuse. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 A.D.3d 1318
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 2014·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Brian F. DeJoseph, J.), entered August 13, 2013. The order granted the motion of defendant City of Syracuse for renewal of its summary judgment motion and, upon renewal, granted the motion for summary judgment and dismissed the amended complaint and all cross claims against the City of Syracuse.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Angona v City of Syracuse (118 AD3d 1318 [June 13, 2014]).

Present — Centra, J.E, Peradotto, Lindley and Whalen, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Angona v. City of Syracuse, 118 A.D.3d 1321, 987 N.Y.S.2d 289 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

118 A.D.3d 1321 (Angona v. City of Syracuse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Angona v. City of Syracuse
118 A.D.3d 1318 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)