Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. Eudey

125 F. 1000
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. Eudey. Read the opinion of the Court — 123 F. 39
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 1, 1903·No. No. 910·Published

Opinion

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. Jesse W. Lilienthal, for plaintiff in error. George W. Towle, Jr., for defendant in error. For former opinion, see 123 Fed. 39. Petition for a rehearing denied October 12, 1903. Motion to modify judgment argued and submitted October 19, 1903. Judgment modified October 20, 1903, as follows: “The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded to the court below for further proceedings not inconsistent with the foregoing opinion, with costs to the plaintiff in error.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. Eudey, 125 F. 1000 (9th Cir. 1903).

125 F. 1000 (Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. Eudey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. Eudey
123 F. 39 (Ninth Circuit, 1903)