Anglo American Commodities v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Anglo American Commodities v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 430

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedNovember 29, 1956

DocketNo. 60388; protests 175498-K and 180189-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 37 Cust. Ct. 430 (Anglo American Commodities v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anglo American Commodities v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 430 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chinaware articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of De Waubert, Inc., and N. M. Albert Co., Inc. v. United States (36 Cust. Ct. 12, C. D. 1747), except that the merchandise herein is in chief value of decorated chinaware containing 25 percent or more of calcined bone, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chinaware articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of De Waubert, Inc., and N. M. Albert Co., Inc. v. United States (36 Cust. Ct. 12, C. D. 1747), except that the merchandise herein is in chief value of decorated chinaware containing 25 percent or more of calcined bone, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 Cust. Ct. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anglo-american-commodities-v-united-states-cusc-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack