Anglin v. Barron

D.C. Circuit

Anglin v. Barron

185 F.2d 755, 88 U.S. App. D.C. 12, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3354

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 16, 1950

Docket10690

StatusPublished

This text of 185 F.2d 755 (Anglin v. Barron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anglin v. Barron, 185 F.2d 755, 88 U.S. App. D.C. 12, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3354 (D.C. Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

PROCTOR, Circuit Judge.

This case involves conflicting claims between appellant, wife, and appellee, mother, of a deceased Naval veteran, to the benefits of his National Service Life Insurance. The mother was the named beneficiary in the policy. The wife lays her claim upon an alleged change made in her favor by the insured. The court, trying the case without a jury, found that no change had been effected and entered judgment in favor of the mother, appellee.

In our opinion the trial court’s findings and conclusions are amply supported by the evidence and the law. Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. A.; Cohn v. Cohn, 1948, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 218, 171 F.2d 828.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PROCTOR, Circuit Judge.

This case involves conflicting claims between appellant, wife, and appellee, mother, of a deceased Naval veteran, to the benefits of his National Service Life Insurance. The mother was the named beneficiary in the policy. The wife lays her claim upon an alleged change made in her favor by the insured. The court, trying the case without a jury, found that no change had been effected and entered judgment in favor of the mother, appellee.

In our opinion the trial court’s findings and conclusions are amply supported by the evidence and the law. Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. A.; Cohn v. Cohn, 1948, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 218, 171 F.2d 828.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 F.2d 755, 88 U.S. App. D.C. 12, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anglin-v-barron-cadc-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack