Anglin v. Anglin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Anglin v. Anglin

618 So. 2d 382, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6084, 1993 WL 182534

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 1, 1993·No. No. 92-2441·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bruce Anglin appeals an order denying his motion for downward modification in his alimony obligation. As did the trial court and the general master, we assume but do not decide that the alimony amount set forth in the parties’ property settlement agreement was subject to modification. However, on the merits we find no abuse of discretion in the denial of the motion to modify. The former wife’s need for the alimony is undisputed. The amount is one which the trier of fact could reasonably [383]*383find the husband has the ability to pay. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

The order under review is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Bruce Anglin appeals an order denying his motion for downward modification in his alimony obligation. As did the trial court and the general master, we assume but do not decide that the alimony amount set forth in the parties’ property settlement agreement was subject to modification. However, on the merits we find no abuse of discretion in the denial of the motion to modify. The former wife’s need for the alimony is undisputed. The amount is one which the trier of fact could reasonably [383]*383find the husband has the ability to pay. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

The order under review is therefore

Affirmed.

Anglin v. Anglin, 618 So. 2d 382, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6084, 1993 WL 182534 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

618 So. 2d 382 (Anglin v. Anglin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related