Anglin v. Anglin

618 So. 2d 382, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6084, 1993 WL 182534
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 1, 1993
DocketNo. 92-2441
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 618 So. 2d 382 (Anglin v. Anglin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anglin v. Anglin, 618 So. 2d 382, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6084, 1993 WL 182534 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bruce Anglin appeals an order denying his motion for downward modification in his alimony obligation. As did the trial court and the general master, we assume but do not decide that the alimony amount set forth in the parties’ property settlement agreement was subject to modification. However, on the merits we find no abuse of discretion in the denial of the motion to modify. The former wife’s need for the alimony is undisputed. The amount is one which the trier of fact could reasonably [383]*383find the husband has the ability to pay. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

The order under review is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wallace v. ZAHN DENTAL COMPANY, INC.
618 So. 2d 382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
618 So. 2d 382, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6084, 1993 WL 182534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anglin-v-anglin-fladistctapp-1993.