Anglim v. Kinney

127 F.2d 291, 29 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 260, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3850, 29 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 260
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 11, 1942
DocketNo. 10081
StatusPublished

This text of 127 F.2d 291 (Anglim v. Kinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anglim v. Kinney, 127 F.2d 291, 29 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 260, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3850, 29 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 260 (9th Cir. 1942).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal herein 43 F.Supp. 431, dismissed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and that mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kinney v. Anglim
43 F. Supp. 431 (N.D. California, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 F.2d 291, 29 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 260, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3850, 29 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anglim-v-kinney-ca9-1942.