Angier v. Taunton Paper Manufacturing Co.
This text of 67 Mass. 621 (Angier v. Taunton Paper Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff was the legal owner of the paper machine. The facts show, not a sale, but an agreement for a sale, upon certain conditions precedent, to be performed by Shepard. Those conditions had not been performed at the time of the conversion by the defendants. The property therefore remained in the plaintiff, and the méasure of damages is indemnity to the plaintiff' as the owner of the chattel, that is, the value of the property taken and interest from the time of the conversion The ruling of the court of commor . leas was clearly right.
Mcceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 Mass. 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angier-v-taunton-paper-manufacturing-co-mass-1854.