Angelson v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.
This text of 240 A.D. 907 (Angelson v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order on reargument, so far as appealed from, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice to the defendant. In our opinion, evidence of prior, similar accidents at the place in question and [908]*908knowledge thereof on the part of the defendant is relevant and material to plaintiffs’ ease to show a manifestly dangerous condition and defendant’s knowledge and notice thereof, and they are entitled to an examination of the defendant upon those matters. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur. [See
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angelson-v-new-york-rapid-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1933.