Angelo P. Ciprari v. Servicos Aereos Cruzeiro Do Sul, S. A. (Cruzeiro)

Second Circuit

Angelo P. Ciprari v. Servicos Aereos Cruzeiro Do Sul, S. A. (Cruzeiro)

359 F.2d 855, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6154

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 13, 1966

Docket30145_1

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 359 F.2d 855 (Angelo P. Ciprari v. Servicos Aereos Cruzeiro Do Sul, S. A. (Cruzeiro)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Angelo P. Ciprari v. Servicos Aereos Cruzeiro Do Sul, S. A. (Cruzeiro), 359 F.2d 855, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6154 (2d Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York which granted partial summary judgment for the defendant dismissing plaintiff’s first cause of action which sought damages for personal injuries suffered in an airplane crash in Brazil in defendant’s aircraft which plaintiff, a resident of New York, had boarded in Brazil after purchasing his ticket there, for the reasons stated by Judge Wyatt in his opinion, reported at 245 F.Supp. 819 (1965), which analyzes the governing New York law. As defendant had already disbursed for the plaintiff a sum in excess of the maximum amount reasonable under Brazilian law, the district court held no further recovery could be had.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York which granted partial summary judgment for the defendant dismissing plaintiff’s first cause of action which sought damages for personal injuries suffered in an airplane crash in Brazil in defendant’s aircraft which plaintiff, a resident of New York, had boarded in Brazil after purchasing his ticket there, for the reasons stated by Judge Wyatt in his opinion, reported at 245 F.Supp. 819 (1965), which analyzes the governing New York law. As defendant had already disbursed for the plaintiff a sum in excess of the maximum amount reasonable under Brazilian law, the district court held no further recovery could be had.

Catherine M. Donahue, of Frances A. Cehon, Deceased, and Sidney H. Cehon, Sr., of the Estate of Richard P. Cehon, Deceased v. Far Eastern Air Transport Corporation A/K/A Yuan Tung Aeronautic Company. Catherine M. Donahue, of Frances A. Cehon, Deceased, and Sidney H. Cehon, Sr., of the Estate of Richard P. Cehon, Deceased v. Far Eastern Air Transport Corporation A/K/A Yuan Tung Aeronautic Company

652 F.2d 1032 (D.C. Circuit, 1981)

Donahue v. Far Eastern Air Transport Corp.

652 F.2d 1032 (D.C. Circuit, 1981)

Elaine Rosenthal, as of the Estate of Martin C. Rosenthal, Deceased v. Kenneth W. Warren, and New England Baptist Hospital

475 F.2d 438 (Second Circuit, 1973)

Tiernan v. Westext Transport, Inc.

295 F. Supp. 1256 (D. Rhode Island, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

359 F.2d 855, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angelo-p-ciprari-v-servicos-aereos-cruzeiro-do-sul-s-a-cruzeiro-ca2-1966.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack