Angelo Joseph Amen v. Patrick Whalen, Warden of the Federal Correctional Institute at Petersburg, Virginia

37 F.3d 1492, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34800, 1994 WL 577730
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 19, 1994
Docket93-6758
StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1492 (Angelo Joseph Amen v. Patrick Whalen, Warden of the Federal Correctional Institute at Petersburg, Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Angelo Joseph Amen v. Patrick Whalen, Warden of the Federal Correctional Institute at Petersburg, Virginia, 37 F.3d 1492, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34800, 1994 WL 577730 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

37 F.3d 1492
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Angelo Joseph AMEN, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Patrick WHALEN, Warden of the Federal Correctional Institute
at Petersburg, Virginia, Respondent Appellee.

No. 93-6758.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 5, 1994.
Decided October 19, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-92-776-N)

Angelo Joseph Amen, appellant pro se.

Anita K. Henry, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Amen v. Whalen, No. CA-92-776-N (E.D. Va. July 2, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 F.3d 1492, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34800, 1994 WL 577730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angelo-joseph-amen-v-patrick-whalen-warden-of-the--ca4-1994.