Angelo Dahlia v. Omar Rodriguez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Angelo Dahlia v. Omar Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 735 F.3d 1060
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 11, 2012·No. 10-55978·Published

Opinion

FILED FOR PUBLICATION DEC 11 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANGELO DAHLIA, No. 10-55978

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:09-CV-08453-MMM- JEM v.

OMAR RODRIGUEZ, individually and ORDER as a Lieutenant of the Burbank Police Department; EDGAR PENARANDA, individually and as a Sergeant of the Burbank Police Department; JOSE DURAN, individually and as a Sergeant of the Burbank Police Department; CHRIS CANALES, individually and as a Detective of the Burbank Police Department; CITY OF BURBANK, a municipal corporation; JOHN MURPHY, individually and as a Lieutenant of the Burbank Police Department,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

TIM STEHR, individually,

Defendant. Page 2

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as

precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Angelo Dahlia v. Omar Rodriguez, (9th Cir. 2012).

Angelo Dahlia v. Omar Rodriguez (Angelo Dahlia v. Omar Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.