Angelo Bob Rooks v. Edward W. Murray

Fourth Circuit

Angelo Bob Rooks v. Edward W. Murray

54 F.3d 774, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17536, 1995 WL 295511

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 16, 1995

Docket94-6315

StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 774 (Angelo Bob Rooks v. Edward W. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Angelo Bob Rooks v. Edward W. Murray, 54 F.3d 774, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17536, 1995 WL 295511 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

54 F.3d 774
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Angelo Bob ROOKS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 94-6315.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: May 16, 1995.

Angelo Bob Rooks, Appellant Pro Se.

Katherine P. Baldwin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.* Rooks v. Murray, No. CA-93-23 (E.D. Va. Feb. 24, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*

We deny Appellant's "Motion for Removal."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

54 F.3d 774
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Angelo Bob ROOKS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 94-6315.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: May 16, 1995.

Angelo Bob Rooks, Appellant Pro Se.

Katherine P. Baldwin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.* Rooks v. Murray, No. CA-93-23 (E.D. Va. Feb. 24, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*

We deny Appellant's "Motion for Removal."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 F.3d 774, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17536, 1995 WL 295511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angelo-bob-rooks-v-edward-w-murray-ca4-1995.