Angello v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Angello v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services

55 A.D.2d 806, 390 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15608

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 10, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 55 A.D.2d 806 (Angello v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Angello v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services, 55 A.D.2d 806, 390 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15608 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unani[807]*807mously affirmed, with costs, on the opinion at the Trial Term (Kennedy, J., 80 Misc 2d 472). Memorandum: We add that since there was no issue presented between respondents Ms. Dusinberre and BOCES, no determination is made respecting her tenure rights with BOCES. In view of the defense by BOCES that it should have a credit against back salary claimed by petitioner, this affirmance is without prejudice to an application by BOCES to Trial Term, if so advised, to offer proof of actual earnings by petitioner, exclusive of summer work, during the period for which BOCES is directed to pay his salary since September, 1972 and, if any are proved, for a credit thereof against its back salary obligation to petitioner (see Matter of Lezette v Board of Educ., 35 NY2d 272, 283). (Appeals from judgment of Steuben Supreme Court—article 78.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Mahoney, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unani[807]*807mously affirmed, with costs, on the opinion at the Trial Term (Kennedy, J., 80 Misc 2d 472). Memorandum: We add that since there was no issue presented between respondents Ms. Dusinberre and BOCES, no determination is made respecting her tenure rights with BOCES. In view of the defense by BOCES that it should have a credit against back salary claimed by petitioner, this affirmance is without prejudice to an application by BOCES to Trial Term, if so advised, to offer proof of actual earnings by petitioner, exclusive of summer work, during the period for which BOCES is directed to pay his salary since September, 1972 and, if any are proved, for a credit thereof against its back salary obligation to petitioner (see Matter of Lezette v Board of Educ., 35 NY2d 272, 283). (Appeals from judgment of Steuben Supreme Court—article 78.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Mahoney, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 806, 390 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angello-v-board-of-cooperative-educational-services-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack