Angello Osborne v. Peter Georgiades
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2179
ANGELLO A. D. OSBORNE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PETER GEORGIADES, Police Corporal,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
DIONE WHITE, LGSW; MEREDITH LYNN PIPITONE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00182-RDB)
Submitted: March 20, 2018 Decided: September 30, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, KING, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angello A. D. Osborne, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Angello A. D. Osborne appeals the district court’s order granting summary
judgment to Peter Georgiades on qualified immunity grounds. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Osborne v. Georgiades, No. 1:14-cv-00182-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 11, 2017).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Angello Osborne v. Peter Georgiades (Angello Osborne v. Peter Georgiades) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.