Angello Osborne v. Peter Georgiades

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Angello Osborne v. Peter Georgiades. Read the opinion of the Court — 679 F. App'x 234
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2019·No. 17-2179·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2179

ANGELLO A. D. OSBORNE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PETER GEORGIADES, Police Corporal,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

DIONE WHITE, LGSW; MEREDITH LYNN PIPITONE,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00182-RDB)

Submitted: March 20, 2018 Decided: September 30, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, KING, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angello A. D. Osborne, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Angello A. D. Osborne appeals the district court’s order granting summary

judgment to Peter Georgiades on qualified immunity grounds. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Osborne v. Georgiades, No. 1:14-cv-00182-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 11, 2017).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Angello Osborne v. Peter Georgiades, (4th Cir. 2019).

Angello Osborne v. Peter Georgiades (Angello Osborne v. Peter Georgiades) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.