ANGELLICA GRANT vs STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of ANGELLICA GRANT vs STATE OF FLORIDA (ANGELLICA GRANT vs STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
ANGELLICA GRANT,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D22-834 LT Case No. 2020-CF-791-A
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed May 19, 2023
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Melissa Souto, Judge.
James R. Jupena, of Law Office of James R. Jupena, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant.
Angellica Grant, Quincy, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM. Following the filing of an Anders 1 brief by appellate counsel, Appellant,
Angellica Grant, appeals pro se her judgment and sentence. We affirm but
remand for the correction of a scrivener’s error in the judgment. Grant was
charged with violating section 827.03(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2019). The
judgment indicates that she was convicted under section “827.03(B).” The
correct citation should be section 827.03(2)(b).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.
BOATWRIGHT, KILBANE, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ANGELLICA GRANT vs STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angellica-grant-vs-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2023.