Angelle v. Spartan Offshore Drilling LLC

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana
DecidedJuly 25, 2019
Docket2:17-cv-07707
StatusUnknown

This text of Angelle v. Spartan Offshore Drilling LLC (Angelle v. Spartan Offshore Drilling LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Angelle v. Spartan Offshore Drilling LLC, (E.D. La. 2019).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

PETER ANGELLE CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS NO. 17-7707

SPARTAN OFFSHORE DRILLING LLC SECTION "L" (2)

ORDER & REASONS In this Order & Reasons, the Court considers sua sponte the availability of jury to the case at bar. This maritime personal injury case arises from injuries Plaintiff Peter Angelle allegedly sustained while aboard the SPARTAN 208, a jack-up drilling vessel owned, operated, and controlled by Defendant Spartan Offshore Drilling, LLC (“Spartan”). R. Doc. 4 at 1. Although Plaintiff initially brought this action pursuant to the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, general maritime law, and the Jones Act against Spartan and Plaintiff’s employer Gordon Reed & Associates (“GRA”)—which the Court dismissed on June 18, 2018, R. Doc. 16—Plaintiff has since amended his complaint and now brings his claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(h), thereby waiving his right to a jury trial, R. Doc. 22 at 3. See T.N.T. Marine Serv., Inc. v. Weaver Shipyards & Dry Docks, Inc., 702 F.2d 585, 587–88 (5th Cir. 1983). In his initial complaint, however, Plaintiff made a jury demand. R. Doc. 1. Moreover, prior to being dismissed, GRA also made a jury demand. R. Doc. 10. Despite Plaintiff’s second amended complaint brining claims under Rule 9(h) only, these demands have not been explicitly withdrawn and therefore remain active on the docket. Because Plaintiff has elected to proceed with all of his claims in admiralty, the Court denies these jury demands sua sponte pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 39(a)(2). Accordingly; IT IS ORDERED that the clerk of court designate this action as a non-jury trial.

New Orleans, Louisiana, this 25th day of July, 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Angelle v. Spartan Offshore Drilling LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angelle-v-spartan-offshore-drilling-llc-laed-2019.