Angelidis v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Angelidis v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

206 A.D.2d 975, 616 N.Y.S.2d 288, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7697

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: There is no merit to the contention that Supreme Court improperly denied the motion of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) to vacate the court’s default order dated February 4, 1992. DHCR failed to demonstrate a valid excuse for the default and failed to move expeditiously to vacate it (see, Ocasio v City of New York, 186 AD2d 520). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Kings County, Held, J.—Vacate Default Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: There is no merit to the contention that Supreme Court improperly denied the motion of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) to vacate the court’s default order dated February 4, 1992. DHCR failed to demonstrate a valid excuse for the default and failed to move expeditiously to vacate it (see, Ocasio v City of New York, 186 AD2d 520). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Kings County, Held, J.—Vacate Default Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Angelidis v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal, 206 A.D.2d 975, 616 N.Y.S.2d 288, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

206 A.D.2d 975 (Angelidis v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related