Angeles v. United States

125 Ct. Cl. 546
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedFebruary 9, 1953
DocketNo. 45-53
StatusPublished

This text of 125 Ct. Cl. 546 (Angeles v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Angeles v. United States, 125 Ct. Cl. 546 (cc 1953).

Opinion

Howell, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff, a citizen and resident of the Philippines, sues to recover supplies alleged to have been commandeered by a recognized guerrilla band on November 21, 1944, while the Philippine Islands were occupied by the Japanese.

Plaintiff’s petition was filed in this court on February 9, 1953, and defendant has filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the claim is barred by the statute of limitations because the petition was not filed within six years of September 2, 1945. Marcos v. United States, 122 C. Cls. 641.

Plaintiff alleges that it filed its claim with PHILRYCOM who forwarded the claim to the Court of Claims. In its brief, plaintiff asserts that its claim was filed with PHILRYCOM on September 5, 1949, and “when it was referred to the Court of Claims, it is deemed filed on Sept. 5, 1949.”

[547]*547The records of this court reveal that no petition asserting a claim by plaintiff against the United States was filed in this court prior to February 9,1953. The filing of plaintiff’s claim with PHILRYCOM is not a filing of a petition in this court.

Plaintiff also contends that its cause of action did not accrue until September 5,1949, when the claim was filed with PHILRYCOM. As we held in Alfredo C. Sese v. United States, ante, p. 526, this day decided, the cause of action in plaintiff’s favor accrued at the time of the requisition. Accordingly, plaintiff’s petition filed February 9, 1953, is barred by the statute of limitations and is therefore dismissed.

It is so ordered.

Madden, Judge; Whitaker, Judge; Littleton, Judge; and Jones, Chief Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marcos v. United States
106 F. Supp. 172 (Court of Claims, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 Ct. Cl. 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angeles-v-united-states-cc-1953.