Angeles-Martinez v. Holder
This text of 381 F. App'x 682 (Angeles-Martinez v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Porfirio Angeles-Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of *683 the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Husyev v. Mukasey, 528 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny the petition for review.
The record establishes that Angeles-Martinez was convicted of possession of marijuana for sale in violation of California Health & Safety Code § 11359. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(a)(48)(A), 1229a(c)(3)(B)(v). The agency therefore properly concluded that Angeles-Martinez is inadmissable under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) and ineligible for a waiver of inadmissibility under section 212(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(h), 1229b(b)(l)(C).
As this conclusion is dispositive, we do not address Angeles-Martinez’s remaining contentions.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
381 F. App'x 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angeles-martinez-v-holder-ca9-2010.