Angela Orozco and All Other Occupants v. Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments

Court of Appeals of Texas

Angela Orozco and All Other Occupants v. Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments

DecidedJanuary 31, 2022

Docket04-21-00447-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Angela Orozco and All Other Occupants v. Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments (Angela Orozco and All Other Occupants v. Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Angela Orozco and All Other Occupants v. Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 31, 2022

No. 04-21-00447-CV

Angela OROZCO and All Other Occupants, Appellant

v.

RESERVE AT PECAN VALLEY APARTMENTS, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021CV02643 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On January 26, 2022, appellant filed her appellant’s brief. The brief does not comply with Rules 9.5 or 38.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5, 38.1. Specifically, the brief does not contain: 1. a certificate of service, see id. R. 9.5; 2. a complete list of all parties and the names and addresses of all trial and appellate counsel, see id. R. 38.1(a); 3. a table of contents, see id. R. 38.1(b); 4. an index of authorities, see id. R. 38.1(c); 5. a brief statement of the nature of the case, the course of proceedings, and the trial court’s disposition of the case, see id. R. 38.1(d); 6. a statement of the issues presented for review, see id. R. 38.1(f); 7. a statement of the facts pertinent to the issues presented, supported by record references, see id. R. 38.1(g); 8. a succinct, clear, and accurate statement of the arguments made in the body of the brief, see id. R. 38.1(h); 9. a clear and concise argument for the contentions made, with appropriate citations to authorities and to the record, see id. R. 38.1(i); and 10. a short conclusion that clearly states the nature of the relief sought, see id. R. 38.1(j). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant’s brief STRICKEN and ORDER appellant to file an amended brief in this court complying with Rules 9.5 and 38.1 by March 2, 2022 or this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9, 42.3.

It is so ORDERED on January 31, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 31, 2022

No. 04-21-00447-CV

Angela OROZCO and All Other Occupants, Appellant

v.

RESERVE AT PECAN VALLEY APARTMENTS, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021CV02643 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On January 26, 2022, appellant filed her appellant’s brief. The brief does not comply with Rules 9.5 or 38.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5, 38.1. Specifically, the brief does not contain: 1. a certificate of service, see id. R. 9.5; 2. a complete list of all parties and the names and addresses of all trial and appellate counsel, see id. R. 38.1(a); 3. a table of contents, see id. R. 38.1(b); 4. an index of authorities, see id. R. 38.1(c); 5. a brief statement of the nature of the case, the course of proceedings, and the trial court’s disposition of the case, see id. R. 38.1(d); 6. a statement of the issues presented for review, see id. R. 38.1(f); 7. a statement of the facts pertinent to the issues presented, supported by record references, see id. R. 38.1(g); 8. a succinct, clear, and accurate statement of the arguments made in the body of the brief, see id. R. 38.1(h); 9. a clear and concise argument for the contentions made, with appropriate citations to authorities and to the record, see id. R. 38.1(i); and 10. a short conclusion that clearly states the nature of the relief sought, see id. R. 38.1(j). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant’s brief STRICKEN and ORDER appellant to file an amended brief in this court complying with Rules 9.5 and 38.1 by March 2, 2022 or this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9, 42.3.

It is so ORDERED on January 31, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Angela Orozco and All Other Occupants v. Reserve at Pecan Valley Apartments, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angela-orozco-and-all-other-occupants-v-reserve-at-pecan-valley-apartments-texapp-2022.