Angela Napier v. Jalen Peterson
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00492-CV ___________________________
ANGELA NAPIER, Appellant
V.
JALEN PETERSON, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2024-004040-1
Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
Appellant’s brief was due on March 7, 2025. On March 17, 2025, we notified
appellant that her brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R.
App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution
unless, on or before March 27, 2025, appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief
and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and
why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We
have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Delivered: April 17, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Angela Napier v. Jalen Peterson (Angela Napier v. Jalen Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.