Angela M. Brock-Sellers v. Bobby Siscoe LLC, et al.

Opinion

Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT March 27, 2026 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION § ANGELA M. BROCK-SELLERS, § § Plaintiff, § V. ; CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:26-CV-00020 BOBBY SISCOE LLC, et al., Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (““M&R”). (D.E. 34). The M&R recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's motion to remand. (D.E. 7). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the Parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 34). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand, (D.E. 7), REMANDS this case to the 156th Judicial District Court of Bee County, Texas, and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this 1/2

Order to the same. The Court further DENIES as moot all pending motions in this case. SO ORDERED.

DANIB-S- MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas March 27, 2026

2/2