Angela Leonards v. Carmichael's Cashway Pharmacy, Inc.

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 5, 2010
DocketWCA-0009-1424
StatusUnknown

This text of Angela Leonards v. Carmichael's Cashway Pharmacy, Inc. (Angela Leonards v. Carmichael's Cashway Pharmacy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Angela Leonards v. Carmichael's Cashway Pharmacy, Inc., (La. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

09-1424

ANGELA LEONARDS

VERSUS

CARMICHAEL’S CASHWAY PHARMACY, INC.

**********

APPEAL FROM THE OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION, DISTRICT # 4 PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. 07-5204 SAM L. LOWERY, WORKERS’ COMPENSATION JUDGE

ELIZABETH A. PICKETT JUDGE

Court composed of Ulysses Gene Thibodeaux, Chief Judge, Sylvia R. Cooks, and Elizabeth A. Pickett, Judges.

AFFIRMED.

Michael B. Miller Miller & Miller P. O. Drawer 1630 Crowley, LA 70527-1630 Counsel for Claimant/Appellee: Angela Leonards

Kristine Smiley Tierney and Smiley, LLC 11606 Southfork Dr., Suite 104 Baton Rouge, LA 70816 Counsel for Defendant/Appellant: Carmichael’s Cashway Pharmacy, Inc. PICKETT, J.

SUMMARY DISPOSITION

The defendants, Carmichael’s Cashway Pharmacy and its insurer, Louisiana

Retail Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter jointly referred to as Carmichael’s),

appeal a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) awarding the claimant

a total of $8,000.00. The penalties were assessed for paying the wrong compensation

rate, for paying the “waiting week” late, for failure to timely pay a MRI bill, and for

failure to properly pay mileage for September 26, 2007. The defendants also appeal

the award to the claimant of $22,275.00 in attorney’s fees. The claimant answers the

appeal seeking additional attorney’s fees for work necessitated by this appeal. We

affirm the judgment of the WCJ and award the claimant an additional $3,000.00 in

attorney’s fees.

The issues of penalties and attorney’s fees have been addressed by this court

many times. In Romero v. Northrop-Grumman, 01-24, pp. 10-11 (La.App. 3 Cir.

5/30/01), 787 So.2d 1149, 1155-56, writ denied, 01-1937 (La. 10/26/01), 799 So.2d

1144 (citations omitted), we stated:

The determination of whether an employer should be cast with penalties and attorney fees is essentially a question of fact; we will not reverse the WCJ’s finding on appeal absent evidence of manifest error. Penalties and attorney fees are available to a claimant when his employer does not provide workers’ compensation benefits as required by law.

. . . To avoid the imposition of penalties and attorney fees for the nonpayment of benefits, the employer has a continuing obligation to investigate, to assemble, and to assess factual information before denying benefits. The determination of whether an employer has reasonably controverted claims for the purpose of imposing penalties and attorney fees depends on the facts known to the employer at the time of its conduct. To reasonably controvert a claim so as not to be liable for statutory penalties, the employer must have factual or medical

1 information of such a nature that it reasonably counters that provided by the workers’ compensation claimant.

In this case, after hearing testimony, considering the evidence and hearing

argument of counsel, the WCJ found in favor of the claimant on all issues. We find

no error in this ruling.

As to the claimant’s answer to this appeal requesting additional attorney’s fees

for work necessitated by the appeal, we rely on a former opinion of this court wherein

we stated the following: “Because attorney fees were correctly awarded below, failing

to award increased attorney fees for the additional work required for this appeal would

be inconsistent with that judgment.” Frank v. Kent Guidry Farms, 01-727, p. 5

(La.App. 3 Cir. 5/8/02), 816 So.2d 969, 973, writ denied, 02-1608 (La. 6/27/03), 847

So.2d 1273. The claimant is awarded an additional $3,000.00 in attorney’s fees for

work done on this appeal.

Accordingly, the judgment of the WCJ is affirmed in accordance with Uniform

Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-16.2(5)-(8). The claimant is awarded an additional

$3,000.00 in attorney’s fees for work done on this appeal. All costs of this appeal are

taxed against the appellants, Carmichael’s Cashway Pharmacy and its insurer,

Louisiana Retail Mutual Insurance Company.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Romero v. Northrop-Grumman
787 So. 2d 1149 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2001)
Frank v. Kent Guidry Farms
816 So. 2d 969 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Angela Leonards v. Carmichael's Cashway Pharmacy, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angela-leonards-v-carmichaels-cashway-pharmacy-inc-lactapp-2010.