Angela Castillo v. Arturo Moreno
This text of Angela Castillo v. Arturo Moreno (Angela Castillo v. Arturo Moreno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-20-00319-CV ___________________________
ANGELA CASTILLO, Appellant
V.
ARTURO MORENO, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020-005357-1
Before Walker, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Kerr, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On March 8, 2021, we notified appellant Angela Castillo that her brief had not
been filed as required. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss
the appeal for want of prosecution unless Castillo, no later than March 18, filed an
appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s
untimely filing and the need for an extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b)(1),
38.8(a)(1), 42.3, 44.3. Castillo did not respond.
Because Castillo has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity
to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex.
R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: April 15, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Angela Castillo v. Arturo Moreno, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angela-castillo-v-arturo-moreno-texapp-2021.