Angela Bernhardt v. County of Los Angeles

373 F. App'x 777
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 9, 2010
Docket09-55534
StatusUnpublished

This text of 373 F. App'x 777 (Angela Bernhardt v. County of Los Angeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Angela Bernhardt v. County of Los Angeles, 373 F. App'x 777 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Angela Bernhardt appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Los Angeles County in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

The district court did not err by granting summary judgment. Bernhardt’s claims for damages and prospective relief are premised on her purported right to transfer her 42 U.S.C. § 1988 right to seek attorney’s fees to her attorney. However, she has no such right and any such transfer would be void as a matter of law. See Pony v. County of Los Angeles, 433 F.3d 1138, 1144-45 (9th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pony v. County of Los Angeles
433 F.3d 1138 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
373 F. App'x 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angela-bernhardt-v-county-of-los-angeles-ca9-2010.