Angela Bernhardine Gallo v. Carnival Corporation
This text of Angela Bernhardine Gallo v. Carnival Corporation (Angela Bernhardine Gallo v. Carnival Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 24-10114 Document: 30-1 Date Filed: 08/16/2024 Page: 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 24-10114 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
ANGELA BERNHARDINE GALLO, Angela Bernhardine Gallo Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Basilio Gallo, Deceased, LISA ANTIONIETTA LIE GALLO, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellees, versus CARNIVAL CORPORATION, Carnival Corporation Which Will Do Business In California As Carnival Cruises Lines, a Foreign Corporation with its principal place of business in the State of Florida, USCA11 Case: 24-10114 Document: 30-1 Date Filed: 08/16/2024 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-10114
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-23266-CMA ____________________
Before LAGOA, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Upon review of the record and the responses to the jurisdic- tional questions, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant challenges a portion of the district court’s December 12, 2023 order that it alleges denied appellant’s motion to compel arbi- tration. However, the December 12 order did not deny that mo- tion, and the motion was previously denied as premature in a pa- perless order entered on October 29, 2023. Appellant clarifies that it does not appeal the October 29 order, and that it only appeals the portion of the December 12 order that it asserts denied its motion to compel. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(4). Because the appellant chal- lenges only a non-existent ruling, we conclude that the appellant lacks appellate standing. See Wolff v. Cash 4 Titles, 351 F.3d 1348, 1353-54 (11th Cir. 2003).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Angela Bernhardine Gallo v. Carnival Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angela-bernhardine-gallo-v-carnival-corporation-ca11-2024.