Angel v. Lawyers' Title-Insurance

62 N.Y.S. 1131

This text of 62 N.Y.S. 1131 (Angel v. Lawyers' Title-Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Angel v. Lawyers' Title-Insurance, 62 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the record in this case shows that the formal decision lacks the signature of the justice by whom the judgment was directed. The counsel in the cause may have an opportunity to procure an amendment nunc pro tune in this respect, in default of which the judgment will be reversed, and the case remitted to the special term for decision. See Hall v. Beston, 13 App. Div. 116, 43 N. Y. Supp. 304.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. Beston
13 A.D. 116 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angel-v-lawyers-title-insurance-nyappdiv-1900.