Angel Rodriguez v. Jack Kevin Arnold, Jayme Arnold, Daegan Arnold, Jessica Arnold, Robert Richardson & Menet Richardson
This text of Angel Rodriguez v. Jack Kevin Arnold, Jayme Arnold, Daegan Arnold, Jessica Arnold, Robert Richardson & Menet Richardson (Angel Rodriguez v. Jack Kevin Arnold, Jayme Arnold, Daegan Arnold, Jessica Arnold, Robert Richardson & Menet Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
ANGEL RODRIGUEZ, No. 08-24-00086-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. 109th District Court JACK KEVIN ARNOLD, JAYME § of Winkler County, Texas ARNOLD, DAEGAN ARNOLD, JESSICA (TC# DC18-17469) ARNOLD, ROBERT RICHARDSON & MENET RICHARDSON, § Appellees.
§ JUDGMENT The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the
judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and remand the cause for further
proceedings in accordance with this Court’s opinion. We further order that Appellant recover from
Appellee all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified
below for observance.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of July 2025.
MARIA SALAS MENDOZA, Chief Justice
Before Salas Mendoza, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Angel Rodriguez v. Jack Kevin Arnold, Jayme Arnold, Daegan Arnold, Jessica Arnold, Robert Richardson & Menet Richardson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angel-rodriguez-v-jack-kevin-arnold-jayme-arnold-daegan-arnold-jessica-texapp-2025.