Angel Rivera v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

438 F.3d 1225, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 12555, 2006 WL 541062
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 7, 2006·No. 04-2072·Published

Opinion

ORDER SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

It appearing that the Petition for Panel Rehearing filed by Appellant having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, and that Appellant has now raised a question not contained in his brief that we may nevertheless consider because it relates to jurisdiction, to-wit, a suggestion that the District Court violated Rule 58’s requirement that every judgment should be entered on a separate document, it is ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing is hereby GRANTED and that the opinion heretofore filed is hereby VACATED, and the Clerk DIRECTED to set up a briefing schedule for the parties limited to the Rule 58 issue only for consideration at a date to be determined by the panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Angel Rivera v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 438 F.3d 1225, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 12555, 2006 WL 541062 (3d Cir. 2006).

438 F.3d 1225 (Angel Rivera v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jeffrey Shafer
438 F.3d 1225 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)