Angel Louis Valadez v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Angel Louis Valadez v. United States

358 F.2d 721, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6788

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 22, 1966

Docket22195_1

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 358 F.2d 721 (Angel Louis Valadez v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Angel Louis Valadez v. United States, 358 F.2d 721, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6788 (5th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant here complains of the failure of the trial court to suppress evidence obtained from the appellant following his detention upon a tip from an unidentified informer after appellant had crossed the Mexican Border at Eagle Pass, Texas. Appellant was approached within five blocks of the border and within 25 minutes after he had entered the United States without being subjected to a search at the border.

The laws of the United States, 19 U.S.C.A. § 482, permit the broadest search at international boundaries permitted under the Constitution, United States v. Rodriguez (5th Cir.), 292 F.2d 709, affirming D.C., 195 F.Supp. 513, 515. Witt v. United States (9th Cir.), 287 F.2d 389, cert. den. 366 U.S. 950, 81 S.Ct. 1904, 6 L.Ed.2d 1242. Such a search is not dependent either upon the issuing of a search warrant or the existence of probable cause for arrest. The test is the existence of “a reasonable cause to suspect” that there is merchandise “which * * * shall have been introduced into the United States in a[ny] manner contrary to law.”

Here there was ample ground for such suspicion relative to appellant, without the Government’s establishing the “reliability” of the informer, as customarily required in a non-customs search. See Witt v. United States, supra, p. 950.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The appellant here complains of the failure of the trial court to suppress evidence obtained from the appellant following his detention upon a tip from an unidentified informer after appellant had crossed the Mexican Border at Eagle Pass, Texas. Appellant was approached within five blocks of the border and within 25 minutes after he had entered the United States without being subjected to a search at the border.

The laws of the United States, 19 U.S.C.A. § 482, permit the broadest search at international boundaries permitted under the Constitution, United States v. Rodriguez (5th Cir.), 292 F.2d 709, affirming D.C., 195 F.Supp. 513, 515. Witt v. United States (9th Cir.), 287 F.2d 389, cert. den. 366 U.S. 950, 81 S.Ct. 1904, 6 L.Ed.2d 1242. Such a search is not dependent either upon the issuing of a search warrant or the existence of probable cause for arrest. The test is the existence of “a reasonable cause to suspect” that there is merchandise “which * * * shall have been introduced into the United States in a[ny] manner contrary to law.”

Here there was ample ground for such suspicion relative to appellant, without the Government’s establishing the “reliability” of the informer, as customarily required in a non-customs search. See Witt v. United States, supra, p. 950.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

358 F.2d 721, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angel-louis-valadez-v-united-states-ca5-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack