Angel Jonathan Koenigstein v. the State of Texas
This text of Angel Jonathan Koenigstein v. the State of Texas (Angel Jonathan Koenigstein v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 19, 2022
No. 04-22-00684-CR
Angel Jonathan KOENIGSTEIN, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020CR6833 Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding
ORDER Appellant Angel Jonathan Koenigstein entered into a plea bargain with the State pursuant to which he pleaded nolo contendere to murder. The trial court imposed sentence in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant filed a notice of appeal, and the district clerk filed a copy of the clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification and a written plea bargain agreement. See id. R. 25.2(d). We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. Here, because the clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the trial court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant, see id. R. 25.2(a)(2), the record supports the trial court’s certification that appellant does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate).
Additionally, the trial court imposed sentence in the underlying cause on July 8, 2022. Because appellant did not file a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due by August 8, 2022. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due by August 22, 2022. See id. R. 26.3. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on October 6, 2022. On the same day, he filed a motion for leave to file late notice of appeal in the trial court.
A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). A late notice of appeal may be considered timely so as to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction if: (1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing; (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal; and (3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. See id.
Having reviewed the record, it appears that both the notice of appeal and the motion for extension of time were untimely filed. We therefore ORDER appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction by November 18, 2022. See id.; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (out-of-time appeal from final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure). We further ORDER that this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless an amended certification showing that appellant has the right to appeal is made part of the appellate record by November 18, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication).
We ORDER all appellate deadlines are suspended until further order of the court. We ORDER the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on appellant, the attorneys of record, and the court reporter.
_________________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 19th day of October, 2022.
___________________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Angel Jonathan Koenigstein v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angel-jonathan-koenigstein-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.