Angel Jiminain v. United States Department of Education, et al.
This text of Angel Jiminain v. United States Department of Education, et al. (Angel Jiminain v. United States Department of Education, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANGEL JIMINIAN, Case No. 1:25-cv-01835-JLT-EPG 10 Plaintiff, 11 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO v. SUBMIT LONG FORM APPLICATION TO 12 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF FILING FEE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 13 EDUCATION, et al., (ECF No. 2). 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff Angel Jimenez filed this civil case against the United States Department of 17 Education and other Defendants on December 12, 2025. (ECF No. 1). With the complaint, 18 Plaintiff submitted a “short form” application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), which is signed 19 under penalty of perjury. (ECF No. 2). Among other things, this IFP application indicates that 20 Plaintiff has no wages, receives no money from any other source, has no money in any accounts, 21 has no assets, and has no expenses. (Id. at 1-2). 22 However, under the portion of the form asking Plaintiff to list “[a]ny debts or financial 23 obligations,” Plaintiff states as follows: 24 I am willing an[d] able to pay the filing fee upon issuance of the order to pay or more fully complete these forms. Please proceed at once and issue filing number 25 as time is of the essence for obvious reasons. Thank you in advance for allowing me to pay the filing fee in full upon review of this or issuance of the order or for 26 waiver. 27 (Id. at 2). 28 1 While unclear, it thus appears that Plaintiff has the ability to pay the filing fee, despite 2 stating in the short form application that she has no available funds. 3 Upon consideration, the Court will direct Plaintiff to pay the filing fee or file a long form 4 IFP application—i.e., a form that provides more information about Plaintiff’s finances. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), a pro se plaintiff may proceed without prepayment of fees 5 by submitting “an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such [person] possesses that the 6 person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” See Flores v. California Corr. 7 Women’s Facility, No. 1:19-cv-1509-NONE-JLT, 2020 WL 8821643, at *1 (E.D. Cal. June 24, 8 2020) (noting that § 1915(a)(1) applies to non-prisoner plaintiffs). “[T]here is no formula set forth 9 by statute, regulation, or case law to determine when someone is poor enough to earn IFP status.” 10 Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1235 (9th Cir. 2015). Rather, “[a]n affidavit in support of 11 an IFP application is sufficient where it alleges that the affiant cannot pay the court costs and still 12 afford the necessities of life.” Id. at 1234. However, “it is proper and indeed essential for the 13 supporting affidavits to state the facts as to affiant’s poverty with some particularity, definiteness 14 and certainty.” United States v. McQuade, 647 F.2d 938, 940 (9th Cir. 1981) (quoting Jefferson v. 15 United States, 277 F.2d 723, 725 (9th Cir. 1960)). And under § 1915(e)(2)(A), a “court shall 16 dismiss” a case if it determines that “the allegation of poverty is untrue.” 17 With these standards in mind, the Court will require that Plaintiff either pay the filing fee 18 or submit a long form IFP application more fully explaining her financial resources and ability to 19 pay. 20 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 21 1. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a long form IFP application (AO 239). 22 2. Within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall pay the 23 $405.00 filing fee for this action, or in the alternative, submit the attached IFP application, completed and signed under penalty of perjury. 24 \\\ 25 \\\ 26 \\\ 27 \\\ 28 1 3. No requests for extension will be granted without a showing of good cause. Failure to 2 comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5] Dated: _ December 22, 2025 [see hey 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Angel Jiminain v. United States Department of Education, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angel-jiminain-v-united-states-department-of-education-et-al-caed-2025.