Angel Garcia and Josefa Garcia v. Andy Flores and Araceli Mireles
Opinion
NUMBER 13-25-00172-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
ANGEL GARCIA AND JOSEFA GARCIA, Appellants,
v.
ANDY FLORES AND ARACELI MIRELES, Appellees.
ON APPEAL FROM THE 476TH DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Cron Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Tijerina
This matter is before the Court on appellants’ amended motion for voluntary
dismissal. Appellants wish to dismiss this interlocutory appeal and proceed in the lower
court. Having considered the amended motion, we are of the opinion that the appeal shall
be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1). See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, the amended motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is
hereby dismissed. The costs are taxed against the appellants. See id. R. 42.1(d) ("Absent
agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having
dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.
JAIME TIJERINA Chief Justice
Delivered and filed on the 14th day of August, 2025.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Angel Garcia and Josefa Garcia v. Andy Flores and Araceli Mireles (Angel Garcia and Josefa Garcia v. Andy Flores and Araceli Mireles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.