Angel E. Cuesta v. Carolyn A. Cuesta

186 So. 3d 615, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3123, 2016 WL 806279
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 2, 2016·No. 4D15-794·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion: (1) that portion of the circuit court’s final order denying the former husband’s supplemental petition for termination or, in the alternative,, reduction in spousal support; and (2) the. circuit court’s order denying the former , husband’s motion for rehearing. We dismiss without prejudice the former husband’s appeal of that portion of the final order granting the former wife’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs, but reserving jurisdiction to determine those amounts. See Revier v. Revier, 45 So.3d 570, 571 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“We dismiss [the] aspect of the final judgment as it relates to the award of attorney’s fees since the trial court determined only entitlement and reserved the determination of amount for a future day.”).

*616 Affirmed in part, dismissed without prejudice in part.

TAYLOR, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Angel E. Cuesta v. Carolyn A. Cuesta, 186 So. 3d 615, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3123, 2016 WL 806279 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

186 So. 3d 615 (Angel E. Cuesta v. Carolyn A. Cuesta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Voorhees v. Voorhees
204 So. 3d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)