Angel Daniel Caraballo v. State of Florida
This text of Angel Daniel Caraballo v. State of Florida (Angel Daniel Caraballo v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 6D2024-0099 Lower Tribunal No. 2007-CF-004511 _____________________________
ANGEL DANIEL CARABALLO,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Osceola County. Tanya Davis Wilson, Judge.
May 1, 2026
PER CURIAM.
Angel Daniel Caraballo appeals the trial court’s order denying his rule
3.800(a) motion and argues that his sentences on counts one and two are illegal
because both fail to reflect his parole eligibility. The State concedes error. We
agree.
Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s order denying Caraballo’s motion and
remand for the trial court to amend both the life sentence on count one and the life
sentence on count two to state that Caraballo is eligible for parole after completing the 25-year mandatory minimum term. Caraballo’s presence is not required for
those ministerial corrections.
REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.
WOZNIAK, WHITE and GANNAM, JJ., concur.
Angel Daniel Caraballo, Avon Park, pro se.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Angel Daniel Caraballo v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angel-daniel-caraballo-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.