Angel-Bello v. State

91 So. 3d 276, 2012 WL 2814161, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11222
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 11, 2012·No. No. 1D12-513·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), shall not be applied retroactively), rev. granted, 81 So.3d 414 (Fla.2012).

WOLF, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Angel-Bello v. State, 91 So. 3d 276, 2012 WL 2814161, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11222 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

91 So. 3d 276 (Angel-Bello v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zamora v. State
112 So. 3d 112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)