Angel Asencio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

520 F. App'x 798
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 29, 2013·No. 12-16519·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The dismissal of the appellant’s complaint is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the ORDER of the district court dated November 21, 2012. We do not reach the issue of whether or not the district court erred in denying the appellant’s motion to file an amended complaint as there is no argument regarding this in the appellant’s main brief. See United States v. Magluta, 418 F.3d 1166, 1185 (11th Cir.2005) (ruling that a party abandons an argument if the party fails to raise the argument in the party’s initial brief).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Angel Asencio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 520 F. App'x 798 (11th Cir. 2013).

520 F. App'x 798 (Angel Asencio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Asencio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
134 S. Ct. 442 (Supreme Court, 2013)