Angel Asencio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

520 F. App'x 798
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMay 29, 2013
Docket12-16519
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 520 F. App'x 798 (Angel Asencio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Angel Asencio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 520 F. App'x 798 (11th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The dismissal of the appellant’s complaint is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the ORDER of the district court dated November 21, 2012. We do not reach the issue of whether or not the district court erred in denying the appellant’s motion to file an amended complaint as there is no argument regarding this in the appellant’s main brief. See United States v. Magluta, 418 F.3d 1166, 1185 (11th Cir.2005) (ruling that a party abandons an argument if the party fails to raise the argument in the party’s initial brief).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Asencio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
134 S. Ct. 442 (Supreme Court, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
520 F. App'x 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angel-asencio-v-wells-fargo-bank-na-ca11-2013.